To my son Stephen’s recent pro-Bernie Sanders Facebook posts (he’s
not a socialist but loathes Hillary and thinks Republicans are tone deaf and
clueless), I decided to reinforce some of the things I’ve said in our frequent
conversations with a brief, pithy comment:
Bernie's consistency is admirable. Note that many of his most
vociferous criticisms of government policy were during the Clinton era.
Bernie’s onto something - here's a link to a great article that puts the
Clinton Presidency in proper perspective: http://www.thenation.com/.../note-to-hillary.../
Scandinavian countries are geographically compact; culturally and
ethnically homogeneous and protected by the U.S. defense shield. Norway has
benefitted mightily from North Sea oil. Sweden, after years of economic
lethargy, reversed many of its socialist policies, as did Denmark:
The socialized healthcare systems in other developed nations are
only feasible because of the U.S. healthcare industry cash cow. Our biotech and
health technology companies, our NIH, our FDA, our Taj Mahal teaching
hospitals, are responsible for most of the world's healthcare advances. The
majority of that funding is derived from U.S. health care industry profits, the
disproportionate share of which are realized in our relatively unregulated
market (even pharma companies based overseas rely on profits from drug sales in
the un-price controlled U.S. market to fund their investments in new
pharmaceuticals). Take that away, and those vaunted health care systems in
other countries - already known for rationing and wait times that would be
untenable to most people in America - would collapse.
Bernie's "MedicareForAll" is mendacious. Medicare has 6x
the fraud/abuse of private insurance (the difference amounts to over $45
billion/year, enough to pay for health insurance for 6 million people);
Medicare's artificially low reimbursement rates to health care providers are
only viable because private insurers pay enough more to offset it. So Bernie's
plan would turn our already flawed health insurance ecosystem into a
catastrophe.
Bernie's free college plan would be a stimulus program for lazy
tenured professors and bloated university administrations. Hillary is actually
right that the surfeit of additional taxpayer cash would just cause colleges to
raise tuition - which has already rocketed much faster than inflation over the
past 20 years - even more.
The "Campaign finance reform" Bernie champions is a
patina for government control of political speech and vitiating the 1st
Amendment. The idea that the government should restrict how much citizens can
spend to disseminate opinions, ideas and candidate endorsements would be
anathema to our Founding Fathers. By that logic, the government could also
limit how much CNN, Fox News and The New York Times could spend to create and
distribute their content, which includes points of view favorable to and
harshly critical of politicians. As you know I'm very active in the political
realm and have yet to find a campaign that a billionaire has "bought."
Based on recent elections, you could argue that big money is the kiss of death
for candidates. Most of what's wrong with the current system is a byproduct of
campaign finance laws. Far better to allow candidates to directly raise and
spend as much as they want, without relying on SuperPACs, so long as the donors
and donations are fully and contemporaneously disclosed to the public. The
media and social media will be able to call out candidates receiving lots of
donations from "millionaires and billionaires."
I actually believe that Bernie is right in many of his attacks on
our priorities and policies, including trade and Wall St. Unfortunately, he
believes more federal government power and spending is the solution, when
that's what created so many of our problems. The more power is vested in
government, the more incentive special interests have to influence it. And when
Bernie is called-out for wanting to add to our federal government's gargantuan
and exploding debt and the burden on taxpayers, he claims his healthcare plan
will offset the tax increases by saving the average family $5,000/year. Wow,
that's twice the $2,500 PBO said Obamacare would save the average family but
never materialized (in fact, costs have gone up for the previously insured). When
it's pointed out to Bernie how failed so many existing government programs and
bureaucracies are, Bernie diverts or dismisses it or blames it on politicians
behaving badly due to campaign donations from wealthy people and corporations.
That's disingenuous and circular logic that will get us nowhere
We definitely need to make truly radical changes in government
policy. But not by making bigger an institution that's already proven so
incompetent and corrupt, and not under a man who, though well-meaning, has
spent virtually his entire career on government payrolls. Apple, Facebook,
Uber, Starbucks, Cisco and Ford - and thousands of other leading edge companies
and startups - have had a much more positively transformative effect on our
country than the federal government over the past decade. Let's unleash and
empower those forces to address our biggest challenges and elect a leader who
understands and believes in them - and isn't beholden to other wealthy people
and special interests.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home